Due for re-checkEditorial contribution

Legal IT Insider

legaltechnology.com

Legal technology news publication with a merit-based Guest Comments section.

RouteEmail pitchTermsSee publisher termsSource check9 Oct 2026

This record is past its 14-day review window. Its details were last checked on 9 Oct 2026 and are due for a new source review.

How to pitch

Email pitch

The editorial policy states: "Unlike most if not all other publications in the legal sector, our column inches are free and based on editorial merit, not the size of your wallet." The publication is news-driven and welcomes press releases, especially ahead of the publication date and especially if exclusive, but does not require one and may not reproduce it in full or at all. It does not give copy approval and will not let a marketing team turn articles into self-serving puff. Guest contributions run in the Guest Comments section. Editorial contact is [email available after sign-in].

Read the publisher instructions

Costs and conditions

The editorial policy states plainly that column inches are free and based on editorial merit, not the size of the advertiser's wallet. Advertising is handled separately through the sales contact.

Link attribute
Not observed
Review time
Not stated

Publisher source

The route and terms above were recorded from the publisher page. Source checks may be automated. Always check the publisher page for changes before sending a pitch.

https://legaltechnology.com/contact/

Reviewer noteThe site will not give copy approval or accept marketing-driven puff pieces, so pitches must be genuinely newsworthy or editorially interesting. Advertising enquiries go to a different contact.

Last source check: 9 Oct 2026. Due for re-check.

About the publication

Legal IT Insider (legaltechnology.com) covers legal technology, AI, knowledge management, legal operations, and practice management for the legal sector. It runs a Guest Comments section for contributed pieces and states that its editorial column inches are free and based on editorial merit rather than payment.